Black lives matter. And we’re all connected. And we’re all co-creating what happens next. What would it be like to co-create cultures and social, political, and economic systems that recognize these truths and help everyone living in such societies live these truths as natural parts of everyday democracy. Restorative Justice is a particularly thought-provoking movement opening our eyes to such possibilities. (And YES! magazine offers interesting stories about efforts like that.)
I’m reading through some articles in the current issue of YES! magazine. YES! curates stories about creative approaches to social problems. It’s green-progressive political worldview fits my own partisan inclinations, albeit with the same limitations I find in my own (and others’) partisan views. That said, I believe a major strength of YES! is that it keeps its progressivism centered on caring, conversation, and creativity and, while celebrating passionate protest, moderates the us vs them energies that are so central and problematic in less co-intelligent approaches to partisanship. It also likes to focus on initiatives that are both grassroots and practical.
But what struck me today is that among all the activities described in YES!, some are more systemically transformative than others. I personally seek approaches that are systemically transformative. This is both a gift and a limitation. It is a gift in that it helps me and those around me focus on what we view as high-leverage change strategies. It is a limitation in that it takes our attention away from complementary personal, interpersonal, and cultural transformational strategies, as well as ideas and stories that are not transformative so much as meaningful, beautiful, or hope-inspiring. YES! doesn’t have my particular bias in this regard. It covers all of these.
But the distinctions remain, for those of us who seek one or another of these approaches. So I just want to reflect on that for a moment and share the article that meant the most to me.
The theme of the current issue of YES! is racial injustice as currently manifested in the belatedly well-publicized deaths of unarmed black men and women at the hands of police. As is its tendency, YES! focuses on love, justice, truth, and other approaches to “making it right”, without ever taking its eyes off the injustices it seeks to remedy. It looks at the history of racism, personal and interpersonal efforts to awaken and heal ourselves of racism, the Black Lives Matter movement and the movements for reparations, community policing, and restorative justice, among other things. It brought to my mind, as well, the work being done by Everyday Democracy to support local conversations about police-community relations.
The YES! article on community policing describes efforts to change the paradigm of policing from mere law enforcement which keeps cops “spending all their time looking for some broken laws to enforce”. The community policing approach promotes – with mixed success – “listening to the community to determine what their problems are”, “earning the trust of the community and making [them] stakeholders in their own safety” thereby “fostering improved levels of neighborhood leadership and sustainability”. That is a much bigger vision than law enforcement, framing the law as only one means to the ultimate end of “public safety”. It made me wonder how much further such evolution could go if the entire community and its government measured their success with self-generated “quality of life indicators”. That would represent a true paradigm shift. The article helped me appreciate how messy and ambiguous it can be to try shifting the culture of policing separately from the larger culture in which police activities and consciousness are embedded. A shift in policing would happen with greater clarity if it were part of a larger whole-society shift towards the co-creation of shared quality of life as our standard rather than competing to possess lots of unsustainable material stuff, money, and status as part of an often oppressive form of “order”.
THAT shift – already underway in many realms – involves taking seriously a deeper realization: that we are fundamentally – FUNDAMENTALLY – interconnected with each other and nature. And that brings me to the article in the current YES! that struck me the most, which is the one included below. It is an appeal for the US to undertake a truth and reconciliation process on violence against African Americans similar to that undertaken years ago in South Africa as apartheid came to an official end. The author, Fania Davis, notes that truth and reconciliation efforts are manifestations of a paradigm-shifting movement called “restorative justice”. Restorative justice contrasts with punitive justice and the use of legal systems to control or repress populations. Davis writes that restorative justice (RJ) creates
safe spaces for encounters between persons harmed and persons responsible for harm, including their families and communities. These encounters encourage participants to get to truth, address needs, responsibilities, and root causes, make amends, and forge different futures through restored relationships based upon mutual respect and recognition. Restorative justice is founded on a worldview that affirms our participation in a vast web of interrelatedness. It sees crimes as acts that rupture the web, damaging the relationship not only between the individuals directly involved but also vibrating out to injure relationships with families and communities. The purpose of RJ is to repair the harm caused to the whole of the web, restoring relationships to move into a brighter future.
This is a co-intelligent paradigm shift towards empathic conversations seeking wiser understandings and healthier relationships leading to co-created futures that work for all. Community policing is another systemic transformation that reflects that paradigm. So are economies based on sharing and gifting. So is politics based on high quality citizen deliberation and choice-creating and a culture of dialogue that supports self-organized resilient communities. Virtually every sector and issue can be viewed through the visionary co-intelligent lens of conscious co-creation of good lives together, learning and adapting together as conditions change.
We’re not there yet, obviously. If you want to keep in touch with efforts to get there, you’d probably enjoy subscribing to YES! magazine. And in the meantime, if you are trapped by police who are themselves trapped in a system that sees all people – especially people who aren’t “white” – as separate and very likely culpable of something, here are 10 Rules of Survival if Stopped by the Police – especially if you are male, young, and black or brown. I found this video to be as compelling and heartful as it is critically useful to us all.
Blessings on the Journey we are all on together even when we think we aren’t. May we all get home safely, whatever home may be for us.
= = = = =
by Fania Davis
posted Dec 03, 2014
(Note: There are additional links in the article online at YES! Magazine.)
I am among the millions who have experienced the shock, grief, and fury of losing someone to racial violence.
When I was 15, two close friends were killed in the Birmingham Sunday School bombing carried out by white supremacists trying to terrorize the rising civil rights movement. Only six years later, my husband was shot and nearly killed by police who broke into our home, all because of our activism at the time, especially in support of the Black Panthers.
As a civil rights trial lawyer, I’ve spent much of my professional life protecting people from racial discrimination. In my early twenties, I devoted myself to organizing an international movement to defend my sister, Angela Davis, from politically motivated capital murder charges aimed at silencing her calls for racial and social justice. Early childhood experiences in the South set me on a quest for social transformation, and I’ve been a community organizer ever since, from the civil rights to the black power, women’s, anti-racial violence, peace, anti-apartheid, anti-imperialist, economic justice, political prisoner movements, and others.
After more than three decades of all the fighting, I started to feel out of balance and intuitively knew I needed more healing energies in my life. I ended up enrolling in a Ph.D. program in Indigenous Studies that allowed me to study with African healers.
Today, my focus is on restorative justice, which I believe offers a way for us to collectively face this epidemic, expose its deep historical roots, and stop it.
The killings of Michael Brown in Ferguson and Eric Garner in New York have sparked a national outcry to end the epidemic killings of black men. Many note that even if indictments had been handed down, that wouldn’t have been enough to stop the carnage. The problem goes far beyond the actions of any police officer or department. The problem is hundreds of years old, and it is one we must take on as a nation. Truth and reconciliation processes offer the greatest hope.
Truth and reconciliation in Ferguson and beyond
A Ferguson Truth and Reconciliation process based on restorative justice (RJ) principles could not only stop the epidemic but also allow us as a nation to take a first “step on the road to reconciliation,” to borrow a phrase from the South African experience.
A restorative justice model means that youth, families, and communities directly affected by the killings—along with allies—would partner with the federal government to establish a commission. Imagine a commission that serves as a facilitator, community organizer, or Council of Elders to catalyze, guide, and support participatory, inclusive, and community-based processes.
We know from experience that a quasi-legal body of high-level experts who hold hearings, examine the evidence, and prepare findings and recommendations telling us as a nation what we need to do won’t work. We’ve had plenty of those.
To move toward a reconciled America, we have to do the work ourselves. Reconciliation is an ongoing and collective process. We must roll up our sleeves and do the messy, challenging, but hopeful work of creating transformed relationships and structures leading us into new futures. Someone like Archbishop Desmond Tutu, who headed up South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, might come to Ferguson to inspire and guide us as we take the first steps on this journey.
And the impact wouldn’t be for Ferguson alone. Unfolding in hubs across the nation, a Truth and Reconciliation process could create safe public spaces for youth, families, neighbors, witnesses, and other survivors to share their stories. Though this will happen in hubs, the truths learned and the knowledge gained would be broadly shared. Importantly, the process would also create skillfully facilitated dialogue where responsible parties engage in public truth-telling and take responsibility for wrongdoing.
Getting to the roots
Today, teenagers of color are coming of age in a culture that criminalizes and demonizes them, and all too often takes their lives.
I work with youth in Oakland, where it’s gut-wrenching to see the trauma and devastation up close. Black youth in the U.S. are fatally shot by police at 21 times the rate of white youth. Children of color are pushed through pipelines to prison instead of being put on pathways to opportunity. Some make it through this soul-crushing gauntlet against all odds. But too many do not.
Defining how long- and far-reaching a process like this would be is difficult because, sadly, the killing of Mike Brown is only one instance in a long and cyclical history of countless unhealed racial traumas that reaches all the way back to the birth of this nation. Changing form but not essence over four centuries, this history has morphed from slavery to the Black Codes, peonage and lynching, from Jim Crow to convict leasing, to mass incarceration and deadly police practices.
Bearing in mind its expansive historical context, the Truth and Reconciliation process would set us on a collective search for shared truths about the nature, extent, causes, and consequences of extrajudicial killings of black youth, say, for the last two decades. Through the process, those truths will be told, understood, and made known far and wide. Its task would also include facing and beginning to heal the massive historical harms that threaten us all as a nation but take the lives of black and brown children especially. We would utilize the latest insights and methodologies from the field of trauma healing.
This is urgent. Continued failure to deal with our country’s race-based historical traumas dooms us to perpetually re-enact them.
Though national in scope, the inquiry would zero in on the city of Ferguson and several other key cities across the country that have been the site of extrajudicial killings during the last decade. Specifics like this are best left to a collaborative, inclusive, and community-based planning process.
The process will create public spaces where we face together the epidemic of killings and its root causes, identify the needs and responsibilities of those affected, and also figure out what to do as a nation to heal harms and restore relationships and institutions to forge a new future.
Truth and reconciliation works
There are precedents for this approach: Some 40 Truth and Reconciliation Commissions have been launched worldwide to transform historical and mass social harms such as those we are facing. Their experiences could help light a way forward.
The best-known example is the 1994 South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which was charged with exposing and remedying apartheid’s human rights abuses. Under the guidance of Archbishop Desmond Tutu, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission elevated apartheid victims’ voices, allowing the nation to hear their stories. Perpetrators had a means to engage in public truth-telling about and take responsibility for the atrocities they committed. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission facilitated encounters between harmed and responsible parties, decided amnesty petitions, and ordered reparations, and it recommended official apologies, memorials, and institutional reform to prevent recurrence.
With near-constant live coverage by national television networks, the attention of the nation was riveted on the process. Although South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was far from perfect, it is internationally hailed for exposing apartheid’s atrocities and evoking a spirit of reconciliation that helped the country transcend decades of racial hatred and violence.
There are North American examples as well, including the 2004 Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission in North Carolina, the first in the United States. This effort focused on the “Greensboro massacre” of anti-racist activists by the Ku Klux Klan in 1979.
In 2012, Maine’s governor and indigenous tribal chiefs established a truthcommission to address the harms resulting from the forced assimilation of Native children by Maine’s child welfare system. It is still in operation.
And Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, also still functioning, addresses legacies of Indian residential schools that forcibly removed Aboriginal children from their homes, punished them for honoring their language and traditions, and subjected them to physical and sexual abuse.
Get to the truth, get to healing
Like South Africa’s and others, the Ferguson Truth and Reconciliation process would draw on the principles of restorative justice. Rooted in indigenous teachings, for some 40 years the international RJ movement has been creating safe spaces for encounters between persons harmed and persons responsible for harm, including their families and communities. These encounters encourage participants to get to truth, address needs, responsibilities, and root causes, make amends, and forge different futures through restored relationships based upon mutual respect and recognition.
Restorative justice is founded on a worldview that affirms our participation in a vast web of interrelatedness. It sees crimes as acts that rupture the web, damaging the relationship not only between the individuals directly involved but also vibrating out to injure relationships with families and communities. The purpose of RJ is to repair the harm caused to the whole of the web, restoring relationships to move into a brighter future.
Applied to schools, communities, the justice system, and to redress mass social harm and create new futures, restorative justice is increasingly being recognized internationally. In Oakland, California, where I co-founded and direct Restorative Justice for Oakland Youth (RJOY), school-based programs are eliminating violence, reducing racial disparity in discipline, slashing suspension rates, dramatically boosting academic outcomes, and creating pathways to opportunity instead of pipelines to incarceration. These outcomes are documented in a 2010 study by UC Berkeley Law School and a soon-to-be-released report by the school district. Oakland’s RJ youth diversion pilot is interrupting racialized mass incarceration strategies and reducing recidivism rates to 15 percent. (Based on discussions with folks who run the program—no studies as yet.)
Police and probation officers are being trained in RJ principles and practices. Youth and police are sitting together in healing circles, and creating new relationships based on increased trust and a mutual recognition of one another’s humanity.
It’s impossible to predict whether similar outcomes would emerge from a Truth and Reconciliation process in Ferguson—and the United States. But it’s our best chance. And, if history is any guide, it could result in restitution to those harmed, memorials to the fallen, including films, statues, museums, street renamings, public art, or theatrical re-enactments. It might also engender calls to use restorative and other practices to stop violence and interrupt the school-to-prison pipeline and mass incarceration strategies. New curricula could emerge that teach both about historic injustices and movements resisting those injustices. Teach-ins, police trainings, restorative policing practices, and police review commissions are also among the universe of possibilities.
In the face of the immense terrain to be covered on the journey toward a more reconciled America, no single process will be enough. However, a Ferguson Truth and Reconciliation process could be a first step towards reconciliation. It could put us on the path of a new future based on more equitable structures and with relationships founded on mutual recognition and respect. It could also serve as a prototype to guide future truth and reconciliation efforts addressing related epidemics such as domestic violence, poverty, the school-to-prison pipeline, and mass incarceration. A Ferguson Truth and Reconciliation Commission could light the way into a new future.
– – –
Fania Davis wrote this article for YES! Magazine, a national, nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas and practical actions. Fania is a civil rights attorney and co-founder and executive director of RJOY, Restorative Justice for Oakland Youth. She also has a Ph.D. in Indigenous Studies. She wishes to acknowledge discussions with Professor Jennifer Llewellyn, the Viscount Bennett Professor of Law at Dalhousie University in Nova Scotia. Professor Llewellyn has worked with the South African and Canadian TRC’s and writes and researches on restorative justice and truth and reconciliation processes.
For more detailed and horrific descriptions of the realities behind requests for truth and reconciliation commissions, as well as other initiatives to clarify our collective memory and recognition of racism, see other articles in this issue of YES! and also see this annotated version of a related Fania Davis article.
* * * * * * *
Summer 2015 Co-Intelligence Institute Fundraising Campaign note: So far 22 people have supported us with $1175. Join them in supporting our work. Our target is $20,000. As you can see, we can use your support. Please donate now. It will make a big difference and your donation is fully tax-deductible in the U.S.